No backwards compatibility but used games are good

EA seems to think that the days of Sony and Microsoft wasting time on backward compatibility is over.  And they also seem to think that the used games business is a necessary evil.  I agree on both fronts.  What say you?

“An important thing to remember is that next-gen consoles will most likely not be backwards compatible,” he stated. “If you [play] multiplayer on a game, you’ll most likely not be able to play with someone on a different generation.”

“So at the end of the day, it’s storage capacity. Unless you’ve got a giant storage server in your house, keeping hundreds of games can tax your storage capacity. And so having a healthy retail channel out there like GameStop or Best Buy or others is important, and to the extent that used games is important to them, I think that’s a positive.”

It doesn’t seem at all like a good business move to concentrate on making games compatible.  Although I’d love them to be, odds are that most people already have the old console so they can play the games on it.  It’s inconvenient sure but companies aren’t really worried about that now are they?

Want your friends to read too?

About the Author

They call me "The Velvet Voice". I'm a Microsoft Xbox MVP ... I like sunshine, games and large amounts of money. You can follow me on Twitter or Google+ .... but be warned, sometimes I talk about some ridiculously random things.

5 Responses to “No backwards compatibility but used games are good”

  1. 1
    BPD 007 Says:
    Member has registered Member had enough luck to win Member accomplished a triple threat Member has played at Unscripted Nights Community Playdate Participant Member is 200 contributor 
    Member is a contributor of news & tips RE5 Red Elite Owner Guest appearance on show Member has been infected I gave, I am awesome. Look upon my Medal. Went beyond 15,000 Gamerscore 
    Premium Commenter

    i have a bigger issue with not being able to play used games. If they drop that aspect gamers will be more pissed. The issue with no BC seems to be falling off from the radar of many gamers I think.


  2. 2
    DeaconBlade Says:

    dude if they do that they can fagetaboutit


  3. 3
    x352x pH Says:
    Member has registered Went beyond 15,000 Gamerscore Has downloaded U360 content on Xbox Live Member had enough luck to win Member has played at Unscripted Nights Guest appearance on show 
    Member is a contributor of news & tips Went insane & reached 50,000 Gamerscore Member is 200 contributor Member has U360 Showcase Community Playdate Participant Purchased U360 Avatar Content

    I don’t know, I have SO many 360 games right now and I love this idea of trading in my 360 to pay half price for the new Xbox but I don’t want to have all these games I couldn’t use y’know?


  4. 4
    EYEGotcha Says:
    Member has registered Guest appearance on show Member has played at Unscripted Nights Member had enough luck to win Member accomplished a triple threat Member is 200 contributor 
    Original Gangsta when U360 debuted Went beyond 15,000 Gamerscore Purchased U360 Avatar Content

    I think it would be a loss if the next XBOX isn’t backwards compatible. I still play some of my older 360 games. It’s as if they would be forcing us to move ahead with the next gen console and leave the 360 console behind.


  5. 5
    Slapweasel Says:
    Member has registered Original Gangsta when U360 debuted

    The least they could do, without online multi-player, is allow me to pay for a downloadable emulator. Also, with this “storage-issue”, if they made greater use of cloud usage/storage, I could play most games without waiting ten minutes for them to load.

    They might corner the market if they made games their first priority. Cut out load-times and stop telling me that “I may lose progress” EVERY TIME I JUST SAVED THE DAMN GAME, seems like a no-brainer.

    -I’m not a genius, but I am a thinker.

    -The Self-Proclaimed Voice of Truth and Reason,
    -Your Friendly Neighborhood Slapweasel


Leave a Reply